Nihilism is the philosophical doctrine suggesting the negation of one or more putatively meaningful aspects of life. Most commonly, nihilism is presented in the form of existential nihilism, which argues that life is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value. Moral nihilists assert that morality does not inherently exist, and that any established moral values are abstractly contrived. Nihilism can also take epistemological or ontological/metaphysical forms, meaning respectively that, in some aspect, knowledge is not possible, or that reality does not actually exist.
I have read about this theory while searching on the works of a philosopher named Friedrich Nietzsche. Its definition intrigued me and I did more research about it.
Nietzsche characterized nihilism as emptying the world and especially human existence of meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, or essential value. This observation stems in part from Nietzsche's perspectivism, or his notion that "knowledge" is always by someone of some thing: it is always bound by perspective, and it is never mere fact.
The belief of someone that everything does not have importance.
Rather, there are interpretations through which we understand the world and give it meaning. Interpreting is something we can not go without; in fact, it is something we need. One way of interpreting the world is through morality, as one of the fundamental ways in which people make sense of the world, especially in regard to their own thoughts and actions.
From his perspectivism, Nietzsche explained that all of these rely on our own perspectives.
That we ourselves give meaning to what topic is being talked about, especially with the extensive use of morality that we still consider if our thoughts and actions will affect our relationships with others.

People interpret because they give a fvck. It remains on each person's perspective, after all. Huwaw. Migueleee, Ang hirap i-dissect kung alin ang opinion mo sa lahat ng mga ito~~ yay. but interesting.
TumugonBurahinProper citation po ang sasabihin ni mam diyan :) panigurado :D
TumugonBurahinComment 1
TumugonBurahinDid you quote just Wikipedia? Please no. I've explained, in my past lessons, that we can't trust wikipedia that much. Look for a more credible source.
Comment 2
Cite your sources, properly. I can't really distinguish what's your own idea from the ones that should be quoted.
Comment 3
Cut unnecesary information.
Comment 4
Check your usage of words. Some are not appropriate.
Comment 5
I really like the way you wrote your article, very insensitive and detached to the topic, just like what your chosen theory talks about. I don't know if this is made to feel me that way, but good job! :)
Una kong napansin...
TumugonBurahinCitations ang kulang mo Miguely. :D
But nonetheless, naintindihan ko at maganda yung theory. Ngayon ko lang 'yan na-encounter. :)
Nosebleeding yung theory mo. Kakaiba kasi siya bukod sa ngayon ko lang din naencounter yan. Kulang ka pa siguro sa crtitique and siguro mas maganda kung lalagyan mo na rin ng own experiences mo. :)
TumugonBurahinmas maganda sana kung yung opinyon mo yung mas malaki/marami yung space/font kesa sa search...:)kanosebleed sya, infairness...umpisa palang este title palang...:)
TumugonBurahinPutatively? Deym. Haha
TumugonBurahinIs it right or it's just me na yung mga nka smaller fonts ang words na nanggaaling sayo at yug mga normal fonts ang galing sa sources mo? Tama ba? Hmm... Dagdagan mo pa, kung ganon nga. Also, you explained to us what Nihilism is all about pero hindi mo sinabi kung naniniwala ka o hindi. Gaya ng sabi ni mam, detached ka sa pagsulat ng article nito, kaya hindi ka naging bias. But this should be a crtic and dapat na may papanigan ka. Also, explain Nihilism further without bleeding our nose. Charot! haha.
Para sakin, dapat isulat mo itong critic in a light and conversational way kasi mahirap nang ipasok sa utak ung konsepto ng teroya pa lang. Pag sinulat mo pa to ng seryoso at sabihin na nating in a boring way, baka hindi na din xa maintindihan ng readers. Remember, we write not only for us but for the readers as well. Yun lang.
Ps. Constructive criticism lang po. Nothing personal :)
Natutuwa ako dahil nasambulat sa aking ang isang teoryang hindi ko alam na nakalapat pala sa buhay ko. Salamat sa blog mo. :) Proper citation nalang po at kaunting linis pa at kaunting pagiging conversational na lang. :)
TumugonBurahinAng lalim ng english tapos puro ideas ng iba yung nasa blog mo. Dagdagan mo pa siguro ng critique. Hindi mo tuluyang na-explain ang stand mo. Masyado rin itong akademiko, hindi siya mauunawaan ng simpleng tao. Gawin mong light ang pagtalakay sa malalim na teorya.
TumugonBurahinmagaling pare well done siya kaso mag lagay ka ng mga citations kung kanino mo nakukuha yung mga idea mo and mas maganda siguro kung orignal idea mo siya
TumugonBurahinWhat is your stand? Give emphasis on this. Make it more reader friendly. Magaling po!
TumugonBurahin